It’s often surprising for many to discover that the Apostle Peter, a central figure in the New Testament and a close disciple of Jesus, was actually married. While not always explicitly discussed in church or Sunday school, the Bible itself offers subtle yet compelling clues about Peter’s marital status. This revelation often leads to a more intriguing question: what happened to Peter’s wife? The scriptures are silent about her directly, but historical texts and logical inferences provide a fascinating, albeit somewhat murky, picture.
apostle-peter.jpg
Biblical Hints: Peter’s Mother-in-Law and Paul’s Confirmation
The most direct biblical evidence of Peter’s marriage comes from the Gospels. In Matthew 8:14-15, as well as parallel accounts in Mark and Luke, we read:
When Jesus came into Peter’s house, he saw Peter’s mother-in-law lying in bed with a fever. He touched her hand and the fever left her, and she got up and began to wait on him.
Matt 8:14-15, NIV
The presence of a mother-in-law unequivocally indicates that Peter had a wife. You simply cannot have a mother-in-law without being married. This isn’t an obscure detail; it’s a straightforward family relationship mentioned in the context of Jesus’s ministry and miracles within Peter’s own home.
Furthermore, the Apostle Paul, in 1 Corinthians 9:5, adds another layer to the evidence:
Don’t we have the right to take a believing wife along with us, as do the other apostles and the Lord’s brothers and Cephas?
NIV
Here, Paul defends his right, and by extension the rights of other apostles, to travel with a wife. He specifically mentions Cephas, which is the Aramaic name for Peter, translated into Greek as Peter. Why would Paul use Peter as an example of an apostle having the right to a wife unless Peter was indeed married and potentially traveling with his spouse? This verse strongly suggests that Peter was not only married but that his marital status was a known fact within the early Christian community.
Echoes in Early Church History: Clement and Eusebius
Beyond the Bible, early church historians and figures offer further glimpses into the story of Peter’s wife, though these accounts are less definitive and sometimes debated. Clement of Alexandria, a significant early Christian theologian and writer from the late 2nd and early 3rd centuries, provides a poignant, albeit secondhand, account. He wrote:
They say, accordingly, that the blessed Peter, on seeing his wife led to death, rejoiced on account of her call and conveyance home, and called very encouragingly and comfortingly, addressing her by name, “Remember thou the Lord.” Such was the marriage of the blessed and their perfect disposition towards those dearest to them.
Clement, The Stromata, Book VII
This passage suggests that Peter’s wife may have faced martyrdom for her faith. Clement depicts Peter witnessing his wife’s execution and, instead of despairing, encouraging her to “Remember the Lord.” This paints a picture of a woman of strong faith and a marriage deeply rooted in their shared Christian beliefs, even in the face of immense suffering.
Eusebius of Caesarea, a 4th-century church historian, also references Peter’s wife, drawing upon Clement’s writings. Eusebius notes:
Clement, indeed, whose words we have just quoted, after the above-mentioned facts gives a statement, on account of those who rejected marriage, of the apostles that had wives. “Or will they,” says he, “reject even the apostles? For Peter and Philip begat children; and Philip also gave his daughters in marriage. And Paul does not hesitate, in one of his epistles, to greet his wife, whom he did not take about with him, that he might not be inconvenienced in his ministry.”
Eusebius, Church History III.31
While Eusebius’s account relies on Clement and contains a factual error regarding Paul’s marital status (Paul explicitly states he is unmarried in 1 Corinthians 7:8), it still reinforces the early church tradition that Peter was married and used this fact to argue against those who opposed marriage within Christianity.
The Silence and Speculation: Why Isn’t She Mentioned More?
Despite these biblical and historical hints, Peter’s wife remains largely absent from the narrative. She is never named, and her direct role in Peter’s life and ministry is not detailed in the scriptures. This silence has led to speculation and various interpretations.
One common question is: if Peter was married, why isn’t his wife present during significant events in the Gospels, such as the Last Supper or the crucifixion? And why wasn’t she with her sick mother in Matthew 8? One possibility is that she had already passed away by the time of Jesus’s public ministry. Widowhood was a common reality in the ancient world, and it’s conceivable that Peter was a widower during the period covered by the Gospels.
Another perspective, highlighted by the Martyrs Mirror, a collection of Anabaptist martyr stories, suggests that Peter’s wife may have been an active participant in the early church and even faced martyrdom. This tradition, while not explicitly stated in the Bible, aligns with Clement’s account and offers a compelling narrative of a woman who shared Peter’s faith and commitment to Christ, even to the point of death.
Why Peter’s Wife Matters: Humanizing the Apostle
Whether Peter’s wife died before, during, or after Jesus’s ministry, and whether she faced martyrdom or lived a quiet life, her existence adds a crucial dimension to our understanding of the Apostle Peter. It humanizes him. It reminds us that Peter was not just a spiritual leader but also a man with a personal life, family relationships, and likely the joys and sorrows that come with them.
Knowing that Peter was married allows us to see him in a more relatable light. He wasn’t a solitary figure detached from the everyday experiences of life. He was someone who navigated the complexities of marriage, family, and faith, just like many believers today. The possibility of his wife’s martyrdom, as suggested by Clement and the Martyrs Mirror, further emphasizes the shared sacrifices and devotion of early Christian couples.
In conclusion, while the details of “what happened to Peter’s wife” remain somewhat shrouded in mystery, the evidence strongly suggests she existed and played a role in Peter’s life, however indirectly documented. Her story, though fragmented, offers a valuable glimpse into the personal life of one of Christianity’s most important figures and reminds us of the human side of faith in the early church. It encourages us to appreciate the often-unseen contributions and sacrifices of women in the history of Christianity and to recognize the humanity of even the most revered biblical figures.
